Technical Consulting & Code Review

Sometimes what a business needs is not a build. It is a straight answer about a codebase it inherited, an architecture decision it cannot undo cheaply, or whether the quote sitting on the table is reasonable.

We review the code and the system around it and report back in plain language: what is solid, what is a genuine risk, what is merely untidy, and what it would take to fix each one. The distinction matters, because a lot of technical advice inflates cosmetic problems into emergencies and quietly walks past the real ones.

This also covers working alongside a team you already have, reviewing their pull requests and mentoring rather than replacing them. The measure of a good engagement here is that you need us less afterwards, not more.

What you get

  • A written review separating real risk from cosmetic untidiness
  • An architecture recommendation with the tradeoffs stated, not just a verdict
  • Code review and mentoring alongside your existing team
  • A prioritised plan you could hand to another engineer and have it still make sense

Built with

  • TypeScript
  • Node.js
  • React
  • Next.js
  • PostgreSQL
  • MongoDB
  • Docker

Common questions

A written report in plain language: what is solid, what is a real risk, what is merely untidy, and what each fix would take. It is prioritised, and it is written so another engineer could pick it up and act on it without us.